The Sixth Form Religion, Philosophy and Ethics (RPE) Day gave students the chance to explore the complex moral issues surrounding the use of animals in scientific research. The theme for the day centred on the question of whether such experimentation can ever be justified, leading to a range of lively and thoughtful discussions.

The day began with students considering the arguments in favour of using animals in experimentation, such as its role in advancing medicine, testing life-saving treatments, and ensuring product safety. This activity encouraged students to think critically about the balance between human benefit and animal welfare.

Students then took part in a series of debating games designed to build their confidence and strengthen their reasoning and public-speaking skills. These activities were interactive and engaging, helping students practise forming clear arguments, listening carefully to opposing views, and responding under pressure. The competitive yet good-humoured nature of the games created a dynamic atmosphere and helped prepare everyone for the formal debate to come.

Midway through the day, the group welcomed Ben Stone, a visiting speaker from Animal Aid, an organisation campaigning for the protection of animal rights. The speaker presented the ethical objections to animal experimentation, highlighting issues of suffering, consent, and moral equality between humans and animals. They also introduced alternatives to animal testing, such as in vitro research and computer modelling. The session prompted many students to rethink assumptions and consider the emotional and moral implications of animal use in science.

The day concluded with a formal debate on the motion: “This House believes the use of animals in experimentation should be banned in the UK.” Students argued passionately on both sides, drawing upon the discussions and activities from earlier in the day. The debate showcased a strong balance of empathy, logical reasoning, and persuasive communication.

Overall, the RPE Day was both stimulating and thought-provoking. It gave students the opportunity to grapple with a significant ethical issue from multiple viewpoints and to practise respectful, evidence-based debate — a true reflection of critical thinking in action.

The Sixth Form Religion, Philosophy and Ethics (RPE) Day gave students the chance to explore the complex moral issues surrounding the use of animals in scientific research. The theme for the day centred on the question of whether such experimentation can ever be justified, leading to a range of lively and thoughtful discussions.

The day began with students considering the arguments in favour of using animals in experimentation, such as its role in advancing medicine, testing life-saving treatments, and ensuring product safety. This activity encouraged students to think critically about the balance between human benefit and animal welfare.

Students then took part in a series of debating games designed to build their confidence and strengthen their reasoning and public-speaking skills. These activities were interactive and engaging, helping students practise forming clear arguments, listening carefully to opposing views, and responding under pressure. The competitive yet good-humoured nature of the games created a dynamic atmosphere and helped prepare everyone for the formal debate to come.

Midway through the day, the group welcomed Ben Stone, a visiting speaker from Animal Aid, an organisation campaigning for the protection of animal rights. The speaker presented the ethical objections to animal experimentation, highlighting issues of suffering, consent, and moral equality between humans and animals. They also introduced alternatives to animal testing, such as in vitro research and computer modelling. The session prompted many students to rethink assumptions and consider the emotional and moral implications of animal use in science.

The day concluded with a formal debate on the motion: “This House believes the use of animals in experimentation should be banned in the UK.” Students argued passionately on both sides, drawing upon the discussions and activities from earlier in the day. The debate showcased a strong balance of empathy, logical reasoning, and persuasive communication.

Overall, the RPE Day was both stimulating and thought-provoking. It gave students the opportunity to grapple with a significant ethical issue from multiple viewpoints and to practise respectful, evidence-based debate — a true reflection of critical thinking in action.

-Mrs M.Richardson (7Y1 tutor, key stage 3 & 5 RPE, and SIAMS lead)